<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LiveJournal + Debian = Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/06/livejournal-debian-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/06/livejournal-debian-fail/</link>
	<description>Fire is the one, who inspires and protects truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:04:36 +0900</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/06/livejournal-debian-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=237#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Well, there is the small matter that Tomboy represents a beachhead for mono into most distributions. The idea that a note-taking application is important enough to require its own framework installed is absurd on its face, yet it represents a major strategical victory for Team Mono.

From there, it is much easier to argue every other mono application should go in, too - as they all coincidentally happen to be &quot;best-of-breed&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there is the small matter that Tomboy represents a beachhead for mono into most distributions. The idea that a note-taking application is important enough to require its own framework installed is absurd on its face, yet it represents a major strategical victory for Team Mono.</p>
<p>From there, it is much easier to argue every other mono application should go in, too &#8211; as they all coincidentally happen to be &#8220;best-of-breed&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R S Chakravarti</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/06/livejournal-debian-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>R S Chakravarti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=237#comment-39</guid>
		<description>It seems similar to what GNU did to Unix: a line by line rewrite which does the same thing.

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems similar to what GNU did to Unix: a line by line rewrite which does the same thing.</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/06/livejournal-debian-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=237#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I honestly do not know if you are agreeing with me or flaming me. Please tell me so I can be pleased or offended.

kthxbye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly do not know if you are agreeing with me or flaming me. Please tell me so I can be pleased or offended.</p>
<p>kthxbye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu Segaud</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/06/livejournal-debian-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu Segaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=237#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I am sad that someone &quot;defending&quot; Open-Source can be so hypocritical about something important: writing an application is not putting keywords and variables one after another, it is building a logic, a structure that enties the apps and all of its internals. Gnote is a ripoff line by line of a previously written application that&#039;s protected by Intellectual Property regulations. I can&#039;t bear how Microsoftian you seem by stating such lame statements about &quot;it is not the same language, so basta&quot;. You are a danger for Open Source, please quit; giving lessons to some, not applying them to one&#039;s self, but trying to enforce ill-µsoftie old propaganda on something else is completely dishonest; &quot;oh, the FTP Master didn&#039;t notice the copyright requirements failure, then it must be an illusion&quot;. The author of Gnote is just dumb enough to not know the GPL and was just cluefull enough to correct it when someone pointed out his fallacy.

I&#039;m sick of your boycottnovell-anti-µS propaganda: you make us foolish morons unable to read their own &quot;holy-sanctum&quot; licenses. Very sad. And shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sad that someone &#8220;defending&#8221; Open-Source can be so hypocritical about something important: writing an application is not putting keywords and variables one after another, it is building a logic, a structure that enties the apps and all of its internals. Gnote is a ripoff line by line of a previously written application that&#8217;s protected by Intellectual Property regulations. I can&#8217;t bear how Microsoftian you seem by stating such lame statements about &#8220;it is not the same language, so basta&#8221;. You are a danger for Open Source, please quit; giving lessons to some, not applying them to one&#8217;s self, but trying to enforce ill-µsoftie old propaganda on something else is completely dishonest; &#8220;oh, the FTP Master didn&#8217;t notice the copyright requirements failure, then it must be an illusion&#8221;. The author of Gnote is just dumb enough to not know the GPL and was just cluefull enough to correct it when someone pointed out his fallacy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sick of your boycottnovell-anti-µS propaganda: you make us foolish morons unable to read their own &#8220;holy-sanctum&#8221; licenses. Very sad. And shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
