Comments on: Microsoft Applies Community Promise to ECMA 334 and 335 http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/07/microsoft-applies-community-promise-to-ecma-334-and-335/ Fire is the one, who inspires and protects truth. Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:04:36 +0900 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Jason http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/07/microsoft-applies-community-promise-to-ecma-334-and-335/comment-page-1/#comment-11 Jason Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:04:09 +0000 http://mono-nono.com/?p=248#comment-11 No-one? My mistake, then. No-one? My mistake, then.

]]> By: Jason http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/07/microsoft-applies-community-promise-to-ecma-334-and-335/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Jason Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:45:10 +0000 http://mono-nono.com/?p=248#comment-10 blah, I see how that could be interpreted because Stallman does speak directly to "C#" rather than ".NET" or a broader term. I didn't take his remarks that way, but it is a fair criticism of his remarks. blah, I see how that could be interpreted because Stallman does speak directly to “C#” rather than “.NET” or a broader term.
I didn’t take his remarks that way, but it is a fair criticism of his remarks.

]]> By: jon skip http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/07/microsoft-applies-community-promise-to-ecma-334-and-335/comment-page-1/#comment-7 jon skip Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:38:32 +0000 http://mono-nono.com/?p=248#comment-7 No one writing Mono-based free software for Linux is using anything outside of the ECMA portions of .NET, so your fears are misplaced. No one writing Mono-based free software for Linux is using anything outside of the ECMA portions of .NET, so your fears are misplaced.

]]> By: blah http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/07/microsoft-applies-community-promise-to-ecma-334-and-335/comment-page-1/#comment-6 blah Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:28:37 +0000 http://mono-nono.com/?p=248#comment-6 "Virtually no one was raising the question on patents on the standard proper before, but focusing on those parts of mono outside the standard." Except RMS: http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono “Virtually no one was raising the question on patents on the standard proper before, but focusing on those parts of mono outside the standard.”

Except RMS:
http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono

]]>