<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RMS says promise is &#8220;quite inadequate&#8221;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/09/rms-says-promise-is-quite-inadequate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/09/rms-says-promise-is-quite-inadequate/</link>
	<description>Fire is the one, who inspires and protects truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:04:36 +0900</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/09/rms-says-promise-is-quite-inadequate/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=299#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Johnny,

Thanks for the comments!

You are probably right about not being able to appease rms. I happen to think that is a good thing - we need some people that will stand the moral ground come what may - so we have a measurement for how far off the path we are. I can understand why not everyone thinks that is such a great position, though. So, fair enough point I think.

What is there not to forget about dotGNU, though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments!</p>
<p>You are probably right about not being able to appease rms. I happen to think that is a good thing &#8211; we need some people that will stand the moral ground come what may &#8211; so we have a measurement for how far off the path we are. I can understand why not everyone thinks that is such a great position, though. So, fair enough point I think.</p>
<p>What is there not to forget about dotGNU, though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Stavros</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/07/09/rms-says-promise-is-quite-inadequate/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Stavros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=299#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Nothing short of full compliance to his ideals and releasing .NET itself under the GPLv3 will appease rms. Microsoft has shown that they&#039;re willing to at least meet half-way.

I&#039;d say team Mono + Novell + Microsoft has the upper hand in credibility over rms on this one.

Let&#039;s not forget about dotGNU, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing short of full compliance to his ideals and releasing .NET itself under the GPLv3 will appease rms. Microsoft has shown that they&#8217;re willing to at least meet half-way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say team Mono + Novell + Microsoft has the upper hand in credibility over rms on this one.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget about dotGNU, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
