In continuing our service for Gold Club Members, I’ve enabled nested commenting to hopefully make some of the discussion threads easier to follow.
Yes, it was mainly for you two dudes arguing about compilers and junk. No one understands that. Get back to calling people shills and zealots please. That’s language we all understand.
By default, nesting is set to 5 levels deep. That means once you have back-and-forth beyond the limits of the software, you have entered true wankery and time to call a truce. We can extend the limits of wankery if needed, but personally I feel, argument, counter-argument, rebuttal, and counter-rebuttal is pretty sufficient to let everyone get a fair shake at things.
OPTION 2: Make your argument in the form of a rational, reasoned argument and I will post it up as a article. I will pay you what I get for a post. Hell, I will pay you 5x what I get for a post. Guess what I get for a post?
#1 by Jo Shields on July 28th, 2009
The love and respect of your peers?
#2 by Jo Shields on July 28th, 2009
Oh, and you know what might help for the brokenness of multi-level blockquote? Define a padding/margin for “blockquote blockquote” as very small compared to “blockquote”, which means only first-level quotes get big indents?
#3 by Jason on July 28th, 2009
@Jo,
I’ll have to look at the CSS; that’s another thing I’m “change-and-test” about. I will try to get to it, though.
#4 by Lex on July 29th, 2009
You are an anti-wankery zealot…
#5 by bambox on July 29th, 2009
I think this is a good time to test out the indentation capabilitrons, don’t you?
#6 by nachokb on July 30th, 2009
really?
#7 by bambox on July 30th, 2009
If not that, then I think we should at least attempt a sine wave or two.
#8 by zekopeko on July 30th, 2009
Just testing OpenID