mono-nono

The mono-nono.com patented Myth Index! The Myth Index is a cross-referencing of common myths and disinformation back into posts that expose, argue or deconstruct the lies!

If you spot a common argument floating around that I haven’t addressed, you are quite welcome to contact me.

Microsoft doesn’t use patents aggressively.

• Aggresive Perfector

Mono outperforms [INSERT NON AWESOME ROCKS TECH HERE]

• Here we go again – why mono apologetics suck
• If it sounds too good to be true

Mono is enabling .NET Windows developers to develop for Linux

• Here we go again – why mono apologetics suck
• Windows developers on mono
• A Mono Success Story

Mono is not mentioned in the Novell-Microsoft deal

• Here we go again – why mono apologetics suck
• Baker’s Dozen

Microsoft is just like any other company

• Here we go again – why mono apologetics suck
• FSF on Microsoft’s “Empty Promise”

Mono is protected by the ECMA standard

• Here we go again – why mono apologetics suck
• Weak sauce arguments are here to stay
• Criticism where it is due
• RMS says promise is “quite inadequate”

Mono apologists are always nice and polite

• Here we go again – why mono apologetics suck
• Strange Bedfellows
• In the ghetto
• Airtight Logic
• Settle up
• On apples and how they do not fall far from the trees
• And the knives come out
• The “Why” behind Gnote

There is strong user demand for mono

• Brainstorm!
• SDTimes on mono development

The  Jim Miller email

• Settle up

Patents suck. There’s really nothing you can do, so don’t worry about just Mono.

• ZOMG! TEH DISINFORMATION!
• On Software Patents, the old standby
• FSF on Microsoft’s “Empty Promise”

Mono supports just want the “best-of-breed” applications

• Brainstorm!
• On apples and how they do not fall far from the trees
• The “Why” behind Gnote

Mono critics are unreasonable zealots

• Things that would change my mind
• On Linus and Free Software

Mono critics do not contribute or participate in the community

• Coming out of the closet