<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mono-nono &#187; CodePlex Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mono-nono.com/tag/codeplex-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mono-nono.com</link>
	<description>Fire is the one, who inspires and protects truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 01:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Codeplex Foundation Motivations Revealed</title>
		<link>http://mono-nono.com/2009/09/25/codeplex-foundation-motivations-revealed/</link>
		<comments>http://mono-nono.com/2009/09/25/codeplex-foundation-motivations-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CodePlex Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mono-nono.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft man Sam Ramji reveals some of the Codeplex Foundation&#8217;s motivations.
In responding to the devastating criticism of the Codeplex Foundation&#8217;s fundamentally flawed organization and the high skepticism of its motives, Mr. Ramji revealed a bit of the true motives behind the Codeplex Foundation:
Look at projects related to Mono, you also can look at NUnit, NHibernate, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft man Sam Ramji reveals some of the Codeplex Foundation&#8217;s motivations.<span id="more-577"></span></p>
<p>In responding to the devastating criticism of the Codeplex Foundation&#8217;s fundamentally flawed organization and the high skepticism of its motives, Mr. Ramji revealed <a href="http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=ED63A63B-1A64-67EA-E4F486898012EA02">a bit of the true motives</a> behind the Codeplex Foundation:</p>
<blockquote><p>Look at projects related to Mono, you also can look at NUnit, NHibernate, we really feel optimistic that the Foundation could help them gain a higher level of credibility in the open source community. They feel they have been lacking that strong moral support.</p></blockquote>
<p>Break that down and chew on it a bit!</p>
<p>Mr. Ramji is saying you know those <strong>Microsoft-approved</strong> &#8220;Open Source&#8221; projects like Mono? And you know how the Open Source community keeps rejecting them? Well Microsoft is going to create our own playing field and support them!</p>
<p>In fact, Microsoft is going to provide &#8220;strong moral support&#8221;! Oh, Microsoft. Your &#8220;Open Source&#8221; people are so often good for a chuckle. Thank you for that, at least. <strong>Strong moral support</strong>. From Microsoft. In Open Source. Heh.</p>
<p>I like this because it is largely the pro-Novell, pro-Microsoft people who are always trying to argue that ideals and morals don&#8217;t matter. It&#8217;s all about what the user wants, and being &#8220;pragmatic&#8221;, and &#8220;Microsoft is just a business doing business like any other business&#8221;. But here we have talk about needing &#8220;credibility&#8221; and &#8220;moral support&#8221;? Knock me down with a feather! The notion that there is an underlying moral and ideologial foundation to Open Source! Why that there is zealot talk!</p>
<p>Microsoft is not new at leveraging its considerable resources into creating a rubber-stamp pre-approved situation, especially when the real and existing community doesn&#8217;t want anything to do with Microsoft&#8217;s offerings &#8211; &lt;cough&gt; OOXML&lt;/cough&gt; &#8211; and the CodePlex Foundation is just another example of that.</p>
<p>The very idea that Microsoft can even set up an independent Open Source foundation is absolutely ludicrious. Pick any absurd analogy you like: Yankees fans setting up a Red Sox Appreciation Society, the Klan setting up a Civil Rights commission, Nickleback fans setting up a music appreciation group, whatever.</p>
<p>The big defense on Mr. Ramji&#8217;s part is that the OpenPlex Foundation is in &#8220;beta&#8221;. Software is in &#8220;beta&#8221;, organizations are not. Organizations are founded with a purpose, a mission, and an agenda. Yours is showing, Microsoft. Yours is showing.</p>
<p><em>This article was cross-posted at <a href="http://the-source.com">The-Source.com</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mono-nono.com/2009/09/25/codeplex-foundation-motivations-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
